1. Details of the problem: 1. The stipulation of labor remuneration in the labor contract is: upon agreement between Party A and Party B, Party B's salary shall be determined in accordance with the following paragraph 2: Article 2: Party A implements a piece-rate wage system. For details, please refer to the labor quotas and wage prices formulated by Party A in accordance with the law. The factory inspection wages provided by our unit to the factory inspection teachers are calculated based on the time-based wage system, which leads to inconsistencies between the two places. 2. The "Regulations on Wage Standards -- Rongshun No. 05" signed between our company and employees stipulates that the enterprise employees are paid out based on the monthly basic salary + overtime pay + overproduction bonus + attendance bonus; the management heating salary is paid out based on the basic salary + overtime pay + subsidy + attendance bonus. However, the factory inspection salary of our company is calculated based on the basic salary + overtime pay. This leads to the inconsistency of the salary calculation methods in the two places, and the monthly standard salary indicated is also inconsistent. 3. Our financial department has already changed the content of "Regulations on Wage Standards -- Rongshun No. 05", which now stipulates that: enterprise employees are paid monthly basic salary + overtime wages; management personnel are paid monthly basic salary + overtime wages. This is consistent with the calculation method of factory inspection wages, and the monthly basic salary indicated is also consistent. However, this new wage standard regulation did not replace the old one in the employee file in time. 2. Problem Analysis: 1. Because the contract was signed based on the actual situation, the employees in the workshop were indeed paid on a piece-rate basis. However, the factory inspection required a contract that paid on a time-based basis, and no labor contract consistent with the factory inspection wage calculation method was prepared for the factory inspection. 2. The salary indicated in the regulations on wage standards signed by employees is calculated based on basic salary + overtime pay + subsidy + attendance bonus, which is true. However, this is inconsistent with the calculation method of factory inspection wages, and the new regulations of Photon Performance that are consistent with the factory inspection wage calculation method have not been replaced in a timely manner. 3. The regulations on wage standards were not updated in a timely manner, and the new regulations were not promoted throughout the factory in a timely manner. 3. Consequences: The wage calculation method stipulated in the employees' labor contracts and the wage standards is inconsistent and ununiform with the factory inspection wage calculation method, which directly led to the failure of our unit's factory inspection, which will have serious consequences for the company. 4. Suggestions: 1. Prepare a labor contract for factory inspection that is consistent with the factory inspection wage accounting method, and ask the security department to have each employee sign and stamp it again. 2. Timely replace the old regulations on wage standards in employee files, and have the security department sign and stamp them for each employee. 3. When there are data updates in the future, please update them in a timely manner and do not procrastinate.
|