Liang Mei, executive vice president and secretary general of the China Toy Association, recently responded positively to the overseas public opinion that some toy factories in my country do not assume social responsibility. She said that the inspection and review (factory inspection) of toy factories in my country by some international non-governmental human rights organizations and major international buyers is neither standardized nor transparent, which makes the enterprises feel at a loss. Their false criticism of our factories has caused negative impacts both at home and abroad. Liang Mei made these remarks while attending the 2006 China-EU Toy Safety Seminar and delivering a speech. She pointed out that in recent years, international non-governmental human rights organizations and international major buyers have paid more and more attention to the social responsibilities of toy retailers and toy manufacturers, and more and more toy factories in my country have been subject to factory inspections. This is not a bad thing, but the problem lies in the inconsistent standards and repeated factory inspections. Liang Mei gave an example, saying that some toy factories in Guangdong even have to receive five or six groups of overseas factory inspection personnel a day, which makes the factories overwhelmed. In addition, some international major buyers and institutions sent investigators to find workers outside the factory gates in Guangdong and other places to understand the situation. They got a few words that met the requirements of some people, and then exaggerated them without verification, causing some toy factories in my country to suffer unjust accusations. Factory inspections mainly check the social responsibility of enterprises, including employee benefits and wages, safety, environmental protection, etc. However, some factories that have done well in these aspects reported that after each inspection, some major international buyers would give the factory a result. But the strange thing is that we are obviously doing better than some foreign companies, but we have received a "red card" (i.e. no export in the future) or a "yellow card" warning, while foreign companies that are worse than us have received a "green card" and have smooth exports. Liang Mei said that the double standards, opacity and non-standardization in the factory inspection process are everywhere, which makes people suspect that there are shameful behaviors involved. The above phenomenon has attracted the attention of the International Toy Industry Association Council. The Council is currently soliciting opinions from various parties to formulate international unified standards for social responsibility factory inspections, and has set up a special committee to be responsible for this matter. It is reported that in the future, factory inspections will be conducted by independent third-party inspection and testing agencies commissioned by international buyers. If this move is truly implemented, it will help to clear the name of Chinese toy factories. |
<<: Unraveling the "mystery" of cross-border procurement
>>: Yiwu Inspection and Quarantine Bureau serves enterprises and promotes foreign trade
Following Walmart’s announcement of a change in i...
What is Haiwei Yibai? Shenzhen Yisheng Informatio...
1.1 Company Overview - Personnel/Output/Output Va...
Real.de was founded in 2017 and is sold in 30 cou...
eBay cross-border certification matters needing a...
Flickr is a photo storage and video hosting websi...
What preparations must be made for ES factory ins...
How is Haibang Import Logistics? Haibang Import I...
Meltwater can provide comprehensive media monitor...
1.1 Company Insights --- Personnel\Output\Output V...
What is Rakuten Ebates? Rakuten Ebates is an Amer...
What is NAFTA? The North American Free Trade Agree...
What is the cellular supply chain? "Cellular...
How about Good Friends International Freight Forw...
What is Quanzhou Cross-border E-commerce Associat...